Traffit alternative: an honest comparison
Where Traffit is strong, where HireIQ is different, and how to tell which one fits your team.
Traffit's strength: flexible European ATS with strong automation and customisation, and good support for agencies as well as in-house teams. The limitation: customisation is work, and the agency features are irrelevant if you hire in-house. How HireIQ differs: it combines interview intelligence with a hiring pipeline in one product, coaches interviewers on their technique, and publishes its pricing at €99/month.
What Traffit is genuinely good at
Flexible European ATS with strong automation and customisation, and good support for agencies as well as in-house teams.
We would rather you chose the right tool than our tool. If the above describes your problem, Traffit is a reasonable answer and you can stop reading.
Where teams start looking elsewhere
Customisation is work, and the agency features are irrelevant if you hire in-house.
How HireIQ is different
Opinionated rather than configurable, and in-house only.
Side by side
| HireIQ | Traffit | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Interview intelligence + lightweight ATS | Applicant tracking |
| Pricing | €99/month published, usage-based extras | published tiers |
| Free trial | 7 days, no credit card | Varies — check current terms |
| Interview capture | Paste transcript or record live | Limited or via integration |
| Interviewer coaching | Yes — personal technique feedback | No |
| Runs the pipeline | Yes | Yes |
| Sourcing | No | Varies |
| Setup time | Same afternoon | Days |
Which should you pick?
Pick Traffit if you want to build your own workflow. Pick HireIQ if you would rather be given one.
A note on how we write these
We name where Traffit beats us because you can check, and because a comparison page that claims we win on everything is not worth reading. Feature and pricing details move — we last verified this page in August 2026. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we will correct it.